The 770 is only what, 2 fps below that on average. But they're on the exact same perf level instead of 'beating' it. search and assume that it takes consumers time + ti to learn firm is price. The 780 is not in this bench.ĮDIT: it is in the bench further down the review, my apologies. They advertised base prices on, but only revealed shipping. Nvidia never did that for neither Kepler or Maxwell.Īlso, all I can see there is the 960 beating 770 with Hairworks off (and on, on the 960), which is exactly as predicted because those two are supposed to go toe to toe. Also keep in mind that the 290X started to pull ahead when AMD released the lower quality tesselation settings in the driver. So I applaud you for your attempt to underline your view on things, but you're missing the point entirely. EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB KNGPN w/ACX 2.0+ (72+ ASIC), Whisper Silent w/ Multi-Color LED Cooler, Customized Overclocking Graphics Card 06G-P4-5998-KR 4.4 out of 5 stars 1,101 804.62 804. Hairworks off was the way to bench that game, which is exactly how reviewers had always handled GPU PhysX. Pretty common knowledge with that game release, also because it swamped AMD's tesselation engine. Maxwell had a much stronger Tesselation unit than Kepler, which shows in TW3 when Hairworks is used (and when it's not, because that game is heavy on tesselation regardless).
0 kommentar(er)
